|
________________________________________________________________
Product Reviews:
   
You get what you pay for, September 27, 2004
Reviewer: Colin M. Burnett
This was my first L lens and I am very pleased; zero buyer's regret for
me.
When I first started to seriously consider buying one of the 70-200mm
lenses I wasn't sure which to buy. I first thought about buying the f/4
version because it was cheaper but then found out the f/2.8 comes with a
case (~ $40), tripod ring (~ $120), and a hood (~ $35) in addition to the
extra stop in aperture. For the $600 difference it reduces down by about
$200 by including additional stuff that you, frankly, should have.
Most notably is the tripod ring which takes the lens weight off the camera
body but also balances the camera at the tripod mount. With the f/2.8
attached to my 300D it balances just fine on the tripod foot (even with a
EX550 flash). In shooting with a tripod it's very easy to rotate the lens
within the ring to go from landscape to portrait without off-balancing the
weight.
The extra weight is an issue depending on your muscular build. I can shoot
for a couple hours without the weight being bothersome but my fiancee
(very petite) has some difficulties. In actual shooting I find the tripod
ring comes in handy to put the weight on my palm thus leaving my fingers
free to adjust zoom and focus without a hassle while providing a firmer
base for stability.
I cannot comment on the f/2.8 IS version since I've never used it but I
have seen people selling their f/2.8 IS because it was too heavy.
All-in-all this is an extremely good lens and you get exactly what you pay
for: quality. Some day I intend on complementing this lens with the 24-70
f/2.8L for wider angle shots. Of course, if you have the chance to test
all three versions of the 70-200mm lens at a store then you certainly
should test them for yourself. And, by all means, buy a UV/protector lens.
________________________________________________________________
   
The L-lense that puts the L-lense on the map, July 14, 2005
Reviewer: J. Chen "weez"
Canon's legendary L-lense reputation is built on lense such as the
70-200mm F/2.8, this is the lense that gives the credit to the WOW factor
associated with Canon L lense. Sharpness, constrast is second to none.
I know many people are probably deciding between the F/4L F/2.8L and the
F/2.8L IS. If you want the most bang for the buck go for the F/2.8L. Why,
because if you're serious enough to buy the F/4L you will eventually
migrate to this F/2.8L (like many photographers), why because there is
nothing going to speed up your shutter speed better than the f/2.8 at the
long end when compared to F/4 especially for fast moving targets.
Another
big advantage is the canon 2x extender which boost this lense to 400mm at
the long end with great results and at F/5.6, it is one of the best
performing combo at 400mm focal length especially considering the price of
a 400mm lense by itself.
If you have cash to burn go for the IS version, but cost increase is a bit
steep ($500+), especially considering using a tripod will make the IS an
non-issue, and for a shot deserving attention, a tripod or some sort of
stablizer should be used anyway might as well save the $500 and put a bit
more in for the 17-40mm L lense. :-)
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
   
A "Must Have" Lens, April 26, 2006
Reviewer: G. Wagstaff "Surfdog"
This is probably Canon's best value in a mid/long zoom.
I got this the same day I purchased my 30D...along with the EF-S 10-22 and
the EF 24-70 2.8L. Talk about pleased! No regrets whatsoever.
This lens just screams quality. Images just pop out at you. If you're
considering the f/4 model...take a hard look at this one. Add a hood (cha-ching)
and (yikes) the $100+ tripod ring and the value of this lens really shows.
It's a bit larger & heavier but look what you gain! If you're one of those
that considers the sweet spot of a lens to be stopped down a step or two
just look at where that puts you on the f/4 compared to this one. And the
focus speed is nothing short of "holy mackerel that's fast!"
Sure, you could spend a few more bucks and get the IS version...but
frankly, to me at least, if it's that important I'll be using a tripod
anyway. Hmmm, just took the shakes out of the equation.
All in all, a great lens at a decent price.
Read more
Product Reviews
|