|
Product Reviews:
   
Very compact and sleek
design!, November 26, 2004
Reviewer: S. Park "Park"
Nov. 27, 2004--
I just got this camera today, and due to the lack of reviews, was a bit
concerned about purchasing it. However my cousin owns the F420 and I
noticed the high quality of Fujifilm cameras (co-operated with Olympus in
Japan- where Canon, Sony, Nikon, Fuji, Olympus all originate). The camera
is even smaller than I initially thought looking at pictures online. It
literally fits right into the palm of my hand. The hugh LCD is also a
great feature. I haven't used the camera too much yet, but already taking
test pictures I have noticed the Fujifilm quality. I have researched
greatly into several compact cameras, such as the Sony T1 and the Nikon
Coolpixes. Nikon lenses are very good also, but I preferred the compact
square size and design of the Fuji, not to mention the larger LCD. As for
the T1, my friend owns it, and at first the design of it and the huge LCD
greatly impressed me, but the quality was just ughhh >:o( horrible.
Besides my old digi cam was a Sony one and let's just say it's safe to
stick to a FILM company. The picture cradle, the tiny xd picture card,
battery, and etc. are wonderful. Everything looks great..!
To sum it all up..
PROS:
*great compact, sleek design!
*large 2" LCD
*hand strap comes included (just in case [:)
*Fujifilm quality
*Trimming on the camera available. (It's like cropping/editing on your
camera!)
*Pictbridge compatible (for those who love to print pics directly)
*Video recording with audio (The larger your memory card, the longer you
can record! With 512 mbs. you can record up to 156.3 minutes!) Plus the
audio is actually pretty clear (you can adjust volume in the playback
menu).
CONS:
*I wish there was a better optical zoom, although 3.4 is pretty standard.
Finally, for accessories, must haves are a higher xD-Picture Card, higher
battery, and an optional PictBridge photo printer.
I bought a 128mb card, but I recommend a 256 or even 512, of course it all
depends on how many pictures you feel you are going to take. (You can
adjust the mega-pixels, giving you more or less photos).
I hope this review was of some help! On a side note, I love this camera!
(:
**EDIT*****Feb. 28, 2005
It has now been about 3 months with this camera and unfortunately the
review ^(up) there, may have been partially a "just out-of-the-box"
review.
Basically my stand is the same, although I thought I should warn buyers of
these types of small cameras...
*IF YOU ARE IMAGINING TAKING PROFESSIONAL PICS with this camera, forget
it.
Yes it has a 5.2 MP capability, so it's good for prints, but MP is not
everything.
All these types of small cameras coming out these days (e.g. Sony T1, T11,
etc.)have a tendency to produce blurry pictures.
Even though a picture taken on this camera's 2" LCD may appear
clear/sharp, an upload onto your computer may produce different results.
What I have noticed is that outside, pictures for the most part come out
very clear.
The majority of blurry pictures occur inside, when there is not much
lighting (obviously).
This camera requires a very steady hand; less so outside, but indoor
pictures very much so.
Basically, the camera requires the shutter to be pressed half-way to
autofocus, and the remaining half pressed to take the picture.
I'm only a student, so I mostly find content with this camera, because
it's a nice-looking gadget.
No one has failed to express their interest in it or praise it for it's
beautiful design.
Nevertheless, I highly recommend shoppers to consider what they are
looking for in a camera as their first priority in their perfect digital
camera search.
Another important factor to keep in mind is that it is not only this
camera that will be producing such results. I have taken a look at my
friend's Sony T1, but there is no such "perfect" camera...yet.
If you want design, the chances of sacrificing an amount of quality is
quite high, and vice versa.
All small cameras will have a higher tendency to blur, because that's what
they are-- small.
The larger and heavier the body of the camera, it is better able to steady
itself, while smaller and lighter cameras, such as this one, will need the
guidance of a steady hand to create similar photos.
I believe this camera has better photo quality than the SONY T1, because
it's lenses actually "zoom" out, while the SONY one, just zooms
internally.
Also, my friend's SONY T1's prints were uncomparable to the prints from
the F450 (considering all the small different factors, e.g. where the
prints were printed, etc.).
The SONY's color outside was so dead compared to the F450's vivid colors.
As for the big question..
No, I do not regret purchasing this item.
I enjoy the beauty of it, while using it and enjoy showing it off (not to
appear condescending in any manner..).
Read more Product
Reviews
|