|
This camera is a nice bridge
between higher end/higher dollar SLR-like cameras and the 3x zoom
drop-in-your-pocket convenience cameras. At a steadily decreasing price
it's becoming a better value all the time.
________________________________________________________________
  
Not so sure about its clarity...., December 5, 2005
Reviewer: Nereid (Bay Area, CA)
Just got this camera for a good deal on black friday but after some intial
photos, I am not so convinced about its clarity.
Many of the photos that had even a slight amount of movement seems to have
blurred edges. I am not an expert photographer but this isnt my first
digital camera either.
I compared similar photos in my nikon coolpix 3200 and the nikon pics were
very clear.
I havent seen any reviews here that complain about the camera except the
first one - "worst digital camera in the world" and so i am wondering if i
may have got a defective piece (what are the chances of that..i wonder)
otherwise, a pretty good camera. looks big and bulky but fits into your
hand pretty neatly.
the pop-up flash is a bit annoying.
________________________________________________________________
 
Not so sure about its clarity...., December 5, 2005
Reviewer: Nereid (Bay Area, CA)
Just got this camera for a good deal on black friday but after some intial
photos, I am not so convinced about its clarity.
Many of the photos that had even a slight amount of movement seems to have
blurred edges. I am not an expert photographer but this isnt my first
digital camera either.
I compared similar photos in my nikon coolpix 3200 and the nikon pics were
very clear.
I havent seen any reviews here that complain about the camera except the
first one - "worst digital camera in the world" and so i am wondering if i
may have got a defective piece (what are the chances of that..i wonder)
otherwise, a pretty good camera. looks big and bulky but fits into your
hand pretty neatly.
the pop-up flash is a bit annoying.
________________________________________________________________
   
High resolution photos, October 5, 2005
Reviewer: Professor Joseph L. McCauley "Joseph L. McCauley"
25% higher resolution than the Olympus Stylus mu 410, but the Camedia
photo program is much better for the latter (at least for the European
model). Why such a primitive computer program with such a fine camera? I
prefer this camera when weight doesn't matter, but when I look at slides
taken with our old Canon 500 or Minolta, I see that they still beat
digital, unless you go to the expense of a professional camera.
I should add that the camera manual (booklet and computer versiontoo) is
primitive, not informative. Why is this, when the manual written for the
European mu 410 is so good? Why this irritating drop in quality? Actually,
there is an 8 Mp Olympus now avaiulable, sounds better.
________________________________________________________________
   
camera, September 19, 2005
Reviewer: Pawel Boczon "paul"
i like this camera because i can make realy very good pictures
________________________________________________________________
   
I LOVE IT- I LOVE IT- I LOVE IT, September 12, 2005
Reviewer: Picture Crazy
I was looking for a digital camera, and knew nothing about them other than
my word of mouth, that said the higher the mega pixels, and zoom the
better off you are. I went out on a limb and got this one, at an excellent
price. It is perfect for my needs. It is so easy to use, and easy to
download pictures to any pc. The only problem that I have seen, is that it
took to long for it to ship. But I am glad that I got.
________________________________________________________________
   
Great Camera!, September 10, 2005
Reviewer: Robert Avery "Self Proclaimed Music Expert"
I've now had this camera for about a month now, and it's fantastic, I
doubt you could find a camera this good for a better price. The image
quality is spectacular. The automatic settings usually will do the job,
but when it can't (in poor or unusual lighting conditions), the camera is
full manual. The 5x optical zoom, combined with the 5.1mp resolution can
make for some great enlargements. Other good features include a tripod
adapter, time lapse photography, a variable brightness flash, low light
focus assist lamp, audio/video out cable, great macro and super macro
modes (allowing you to focus as close as 8cm), customizable presets,
histogram overlays(to see what will be under/over exposed), and a delay
timer so you can get yourself into the picture.
Also, the camera can record video and audio in .mov format. The quality is
like VHS in good lighting, and in poor lighting is dark and grainy. Still,
I bought this camera for photography, so this is just a bonus anyway, and
it's not bad really.
About the only possible downside to this camera is a little bit of a delay
between shots (dropping the resolution a bit lets you use the camera's
burst mode, which allows for quicker shooting, and still good quality
shots). Also, I recommend you get a larger memory card (I've got a 1gig
card that can hold about 280 pictures at the highest quality mode or 26
minutes of video!) and a battery charger.
As for the first review which gave this camera only 1 star(Possibly the
world's worst digital camera, April 24, 2005) I can only suggest that he
had a defective camera. In most conditions, the automatic settings should
have worked fine, and the battery life is very good. If action shots come
out blurry, switch to either shutter priority or full manual and turn up
the shutter speed to a faster setting. As far as durability, its plastic
body seems to be pretty solid.
In conclusion, this camera is fantastic!
Back to Olympus Camedia C5500 5.1MP |