|
The lens quality is just
awesome. You get a top notch Leica lens for the price of a Panasonic, what
more can you ask? I am totally hooked on this camera!
My only criticism of this camera is that, the replacement batteries are as
expensive as the cell phone batteries, $60 plus, which may force an
average user to be more economical with the usage of the camera. ________________________________________________________________
  
It matches my Tux!, March 24, 2006
Reviewer: dkoDesign "DKO"
OK, so I won't bore you with all the research I did on choosing this small
wonder. I will simply say that it came down to the Lumix DMC-FX9. and its
main competition in price, size, and style is the Kodak V550. The V550 is
a nice, slick camera in its own right, which uses my required SD cards,
but it's 1 megapixel short and comes with the battery life of a wind-up
toy (a mere 120 shots). While the V550 does get some great (and well
deserved) reviews, for just a few dollars more you can get the Lumix
DMC-FX9. (you can read a full review on my blog praxisworks"dot"net)
The benefits? A cooler name? Sure. Sexy matte-black, all-metal
construction? Yup. But mostly, I'm concerned about the equally small size,
lower weight, and astonishing battery life (270 shots). Oh yeah, there's
also the spectacular Leica lens with true image stabilization*, rapid
focus (thanks to the AF assist lamp), and a generous ISO range. All this,
and that extra megapixel, will make you say, "Yum." when you take a really
gorgeous shot and blow it up for 12�16 printing. Keep a lookout for the
soon-to-be released upgrade to this gem, the Panasonic DMC-FX01K.
________________________________________________________________
  
Great little camera, March 4, 2006
Reviewer: M. Clarke
I recently purchased this camera to replace an older Sony digital. As this
was an emergency purchase, I made an exception and depended on the
salesman's recommendation. I have to admit I was swayed by the sleek,
no-nonsense black housing and Leica-branded lens.
So far I'm impressed with the pictyre quality and overall ease of use. The
controls are fairly intuitive although the zoom lever could be more
ergonomic. The large LCD is really great compared to the postage-stamp
monitor of my old camera. I also like being able to see up to 25 images at
once. One big draw-back is that the battery has to be removed for
charging. The battery will not charge from the camera even with the
optional AC adapter. Still, the camera seems to be fairly power-efficient,
so charging is less frequent than before. The memory card is also a little
more fiddly than the excellent Sony Memory Stick, but these are minor
annoyances.
I'm looking forward to discovering all this camera's abilities over the
next few weeks.
________________________________________________________________
  
Great camera, miss the optical viewfinder., February 24, 2006
Reviewer: Randal F. Blair
What a great camera! I am still getting used to all the features. Recently
took it to a concert that forbade flash photos. Holding the camera over my
head, zoomed to the maximum optical zoom, the results were astounding!!
That anti-shake function works great!!! I do miss having a traditional
viewfinder, but I am adapting. The original camera I had began
malfunctioning the first week, every few seconds it would display a
message requiring me to turn the camera off and back on. It was really
annoying and it was during Christmas, so I really wanted to use it. The
pictures did turn out fine, and none were lost. Panasonic wanted me to
send it in to be serviced or replaced and said it would take 4-6 weeks, no
promises! Luckily I called Amazon and they sent me a replacement that
arrived in 2 days and let me send the bad one back to them after it
arrived. Well done! The less than stellar response by Panasonic is the
only reason I downgraded from 5 stars to 4. Oh yeah, sometimes the on/off
switch is too easy to accidently turn on. Don't get me wrong, I love this
camera and the pictures are great!!
________________________________________________________________
   
Best Choice in Ultra Compact Camera Category..., February 8, 2006
Reviewer: mom2sarah...
In my opionion, the Panasonic DMC-FX8 and FX9 are the best choices in the
ultra compact camera category. I have owned a couple of the Canon SD
cameras (SD200 and SD300) and the pictures produced by the FX7/8/9 are
vastly superior, esp. with Indoor Shots. The Image Stabilization really
helps in Indoor, Low-Light Settings which if you are like me, is where you
take the majority of your snapshots. The Canon SD500/550 are arguably
better cameras due to their bigger sensor, 7 MPs, and stronger flash BUT
they are not small enough to toss into my front pocket (a pre-requisite).
As for the cracked LCD screens, google "Canon and Cracked LCD Screen". It
is not an isolated problem! The best precaution you can take is two-fold.
Buy a LCD screen protector as well as a hard camera case (I review one of
each btw).
Finally, the FX8/FX9 have corrected the two major complaints people had
with the very popular and well-regarded DMC-FX7. They now boast a faster
AF, a longer-lasting battery and 640x480 Movie Mode. If they had manual
controls, they would have created the elusive "perfect ultra compact"
camera!
________________________________________________________________
Back to Panasonic Lumix
DMC-FX9S 6MP |